If you work in aviation—whether you are signing the Certificate of Release to Service, managing the Continuing Airworthiness, or negotiating the lease terms—you likely view a commercial aircraft as a known quantity from your specific standpoint.
It is a collection of parts, components, chapters, a sum of flight cycles and flying hours, and a precise arrangement of aluminum and composites.
But there is a difference between knowing the specs and understanding the personality of the machine.
Consider the fundamental philosophical divergence between Seattle and Toulouse where Boeing and Airbus are based and their differing philosophy.
It is not merely a difference in parts; it is a disagreement on the nature of human intervention. When a pilot pulls back on the sidestick of an Airbus, they are making a request to a computer. The aircraft calculates the load factor demand and grants the wish, provided it stays within the “Normal Law.” It is a machine that protects the pilot from themselves.
Conversely, despite the modernization of the MAX, the Boeing philosophy remains rooted in tactile feedback—the idea that if a pilot hauls back on the yoke, the aircraft should respond, physics be damned, although the 787 relies more on modular avionics.
Do you truly speak the language of both?
Do you see an aircraft or asset? This distinction is not just technical trivia; it is the difference between a viewpoint and a job roll that is easily misunderstood.
It can be the difference in reaction to hearing hydraulics failed on one system or an engine failed, understanding redundancy, training and the low risk associated with these events.
We often mistake familiarity for understanding. We assume that because we know the acronyms—FADEC, RAT, IDG—we know the story. Modern aviation is no longer about mechanical linkages; it is about systems integration and modular interlinked avionics. It is about how the bleed air system talks to the anti-ice, and how the electrical bus isolation protects the fly-by-wire computers and how one system affects another.
To be truly effective in this industry, one must look past the skin and see the nervous system underneath. Whether you are an engineer or the support staff, the most valuable asset you possess isn’t just the manual—it’s the intuition to know what the manual is actually trying to say.
True expertise isn’t just knowing what an aircraft does. It’s knowing what it thinks.
Follow us on LinkedIn to more and why not look at some of the courses we offer or email in**@*at.aero with any enquiries.